Smoking Cessation-III: What is the Correct Counterfactual?

This is the fourth in a series of posts looking more closely at quantifying the impacts of smoking cessation; earlier posts:

There was a great deal of data and analytical work behind the development of the model that allowed us to simulate different smoking counterfactuals to provide estimates of the life extension gained from smoking cessation. This effort does not change the key question: what is the appropriate counterfactual?

Table 5 from the paper lays out the life extensions from the counterfactuals we estimated, all of which could be combined to tell different stories:

Using 35 year old male smokers to illustrate, we identified 6.9* life years gained if he quit smoking at 35 and did not relapse. The comparison we highlighted was:

  • 35 year old smoker continues smoking until his death, on average at age 69.3
  • Compared to the counterfactual expected age at death of 76.2 if he quit at age 35 (76.2 – 69.3 = 6.9 years)

But, is that the correct counterfactual?

  • We also estimated the counterfactual life expectancy of a 35 year old smoker whose smoking status (continuation, cessation, relapse) followed the population-observed averages, with death predicted at age 72.9.

If this is used as the counterfactual, then the life extension due to smoking cessation is 3.6 years (72.9-69.3) years instead of 6.9. Quite a difference. In the paper, we highlighted what is essentially the high water mark of life gains from cessation by comparing the life expectancy of a 35 year old smoker who quits to one who continues to smoke until death. Epidemiologically speaking though, some of those smokers who do not to quit at 35 later do so, so perhaps the counterfactual we highlighted was too optimistic, at least compared to the average behavior of a 35 year old smoker.

The exact same model produced both results, the only difference is the counterfactual chosen, and the story being told. Which is the correct one? It is rare that the most important questions are easy.

*This is life extension unadjusted for smoking misclassifciation.

Donald H. Taylor, Jr, Vic Hasselblad, Jane Henley, Michael J. Thun, Frank A. Sloan. Benefits of Smoking Cessation for Longevity. American Journal of Public Health 2002;92(6):990-996.

About Don Taylor
Professor of Public Policy at Duke University (with appointments in Business, Nursing, Community and Family Medicine, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute). I am one of the founding faculty of the Margolis Center for Health Policy, and currently serve as Chair of Duke's University Priorities Committee (UPC). My research focuses on improving care for persons who are dying, and I am co-PI of a CMMI award in Community Based Palliative Care. I teach both undergrads and grad students at Duke. On twitter @donaldhtaylorjr

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: